Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emile Hudd vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hudd vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Emile Hudd vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hudd has won 47.98% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 45.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hudd, in recent form, has won 51.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.1% and 25.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hudd has saved 59.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 51.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hudd has won 62.32% of matches played (W/L 43/ 26), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hudd has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Hudd has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.32% of matches (W/L 43/ 26), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hudd winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hudd winning 2 and Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Hudd and Ilkel was at the M25 Nottingham, 02-05-2024, Second, Hard with Emile Hudd getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hudd and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hudd winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hudd winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hudd has played against opponents with an average rank of 158.23 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 225.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hudd has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hudd has converted 43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 41.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hudd 1 - 0 Ilkel
747
Rank
747
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
417
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
63% (60-36)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-312)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emile Hudd | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (29/39) | 55% (24/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (23/29) | 54% (13/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (7/10) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (25/44) | 23% (9/39) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emile Hudd | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (30/20) | 40% (19/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (257/215) | 45% (194/239) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.49 |
| Aces Total | 136 | 102 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:43 | 1:27:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 145.82 | 171.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (944/1481) | 58% (748/1300) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (714/944) | 70% (527/748) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (251/537) | 47% (257/552) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (61/141) | 40% (37/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (595/1519) | 36% (452/1257) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (13/9) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 38% (8/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 15% (13/2) |
Emile Hudd Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Emile Hudd
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Jimmy Yang
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Emile Hudd
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Sean Hodkin
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Emile Hudd
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
4
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
47 of
58)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Kenny de Schepper
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Maxence Rivet
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Boris Butulija
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
36 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hudd Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
